We have maintained in a recent article that: "The idea of progress, according to our opinion, has to be linked to the idea of equilibrium of the effects. Progress in the measure in which the consequences or effects of the same one are balanced in such a way that I can carry out new progresses without annulling the effects of the first one" .
Now we want to deepen in the relation between progress, therefore we find us with two evident and undoubted facts, but that at the same time they are presented like contradictory. On the one hand we have the massive accumulation of data that show the unhinging of the planetary ecosystems and the frayed of the social weaving of the so much poor as affluent nations. And by another, the anxiety and the natural tendency of the man to the progress. How arrange these two unimpeachable facts by evident?
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Awareness in employment
We leave the company of work without replacing it for no other. We know us, we feel, we apprehend us to each one of us as unemployed in power, underemployed in power, precarious, temporary, "of partial time in power". But what each one of us knows does not return still -and him is impeded that return- common conscience to all of our common condition.
Common conscience, that is to say publicly formulated and accepted, that the central figure and the condition "normal", like tendency at least, they are not more those of the "industrious" -neither to fortiori that of the laborer, the employee, the wage earner-, but that of the precarious one that already "works" no longer "works", exercises in a broken way multiple positions, of which none is a position, does not have identifiable profession and has as Does not it be able therefore to be identified with its work and is not identified, but considers as its "true" activity that by the exercise of which endeavors in the intermitiary of its "work" paid.
This central figure of the precarious one is the one that is presented potentially as ours; she is the one that is a matter of civilizing and of recognizing in the double sense of the word so that, of condition suffered, can be become way of desirable, chosen life, socially dominated and valued, force of new cultures, liberties so that can be become the right for all of electing interruptions of its Without suffering interruption in the income.
All the powers established are opposed to this recognition and to what this entrails. Therefore the power without bonds that the capital has acquired on the work, on the company and on the life of all is remitted exactly to this: that the "work" -the one that causes does them itself, not the one that do- conserve in the life and the awareness of each one its central character, although be in mass eliminated, saved and revoked in all the levels of the production, in the scale of The entire company and the entire world.
Common conscience, that is to say publicly formulated and accepted, that the central figure and the condition "normal", like tendency at least, they are not more those of the "industrious" -neither to fortiori that of the laborer, the employee, the wage earner-, but that of the precarious one that already "works" no longer "works", exercises in a broken way multiple positions, of which none is a position, does not have identifiable profession and has as Does not it be able therefore to be identified with its work and is not identified, but considers as its "true" activity that by the exercise of which endeavors in the intermitiary of its "work" paid.
This central figure of the precarious one is the one that is presented potentially as ours; she is the one that is a matter of civilizing and of recognizing in the double sense of the word so that, of condition suffered, can be become way of desirable, chosen life, socially dominated and valued, force of new cultures, liberties so that can be become the right for all of electing interruptions of its Without suffering interruption in the income.
All the powers established are opposed to this recognition and to what this entrails. Therefore the power without bonds that the capital has acquired on the work, on the company and on the life of all is remitted exactly to this: that the "work" -the one that causes does them itself, not the one that do- conserve in the life and the awareness of each one its central character, although be in mass eliminated, saved and revoked in all the levels of the production, in the scale of The entire company and the entire world.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Convivial Company
A convivial company is the one that offers the man the possibility to exercise the more creative and most autonomous action, with aid of the tools less controllable by the other. While the increment of the orchestration, past the critical thresholds, produces always more regulated, greater dependence, exploitation and impotence, the respect to the limits will guarantee a free flowering of the autonomy and of the human creativity.
Clearly, I employment the term tool in the sense more extensive possible, like instrument or as middle, independently to be product of the activity organizing of the man or, as is the case of the flint prehistoric, simply appropriated by the hand of the man to carry out a specific task, that is to say, for be position to the service of a purpose.
A broom, a ballpoint pen, a screwdriver, a syringe, a brick, a motor, are tools, to equal title that a car or a television set. A factory of patties or a power station, like goods production companies institutions, they enter also in the category of the tool. Inside the toolkit, one must order also the services production companies institutions, as are the school, the medical institution, the investigation, the mass media or the centers of planning. The laws on the marriage or the school programs conform the social life in the same way that the networks of highways. The category of the tool includes all the instruments reasoned of the human action, the machine and its way of employment, the code and its user, the bread and the circus.
As it is seen, the open field to the concept of tool varies of a culture to another. Depends on the mark that a specific company exercise on its structure and its environment. Every object taken as middle for an end becomes tool.
The tool is inherent in the social relation. In the meantime I act as the man, I serve me of tools. According to that I dominate it or she dominate me, the tool or ties me, or unties me of the society. While I dominate the tool, I give to the world my sense; when the tool dominates me, its structure conforms and reports the representation that have of myself. The convivial tool is the one that the greater latitude leaves me and the major to be able to modify the world in the measure of my intention. The industrial tool denies me that power; more still, by its middle, is another who determines my demand, reduces my margin of control and governs my own sense. The majority of the tools that today they surround me they could not be utilized in a convivial way.
Clearly, I employment the term tool in the sense more extensive possible, like instrument or as middle, independently to be product of the activity organizing of the man or, as is the case of the flint prehistoric, simply appropriated by the hand of the man to carry out a specific task, that is to say, for be position to the service of a purpose.
A broom, a ballpoint pen, a screwdriver, a syringe, a brick, a motor, are tools, to equal title that a car or a television set. A factory of patties or a power station, like goods production companies institutions, they enter also in the category of the tool. Inside the toolkit, one must order also the services production companies institutions, as are the school, the medical institution, the investigation, the mass media or the centers of planning. The laws on the marriage or the school programs conform the social life in the same way that the networks of highways. The category of the tool includes all the instruments reasoned of the human action, the machine and its way of employment, the code and its user, the bread and the circus.
As it is seen, the open field to the concept of tool varies of a culture to another. Depends on the mark that a specific company exercise on its structure and its environment. Every object taken as middle for an end becomes tool.
The tool is inherent in the social relation. In the meantime I act as the man, I serve me of tools. According to that I dominate it or she dominate me, the tool or ties me, or unties me of the society. While I dominate the tool, I give to the world my sense; when the tool dominates me, its structure conforms and reports the representation that have of myself. The convivial tool is the one that the greater latitude leaves me and the major to be able to modify the world in the measure of my intention. The industrial tool denies me that power; more still, by its middle, is another who determines my demand, reduces my margin of control and governs my own sense. The majority of the tools that today they surround me they could not be utilized in a convivial way.
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Java and other course
I love computers.I have finished several computer courses which have been worthwhile.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)